Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Find jerk of time varying force

Parent

Find jerk of time varying force

+1
−0

This gravitational field we move inside has some distance L after which it becomes 0.Before L it is just like any gravitational field. Suppose we move inside that gravitational field.The acceleration we experience depends on the distance from the planet. $$a\sim\frac{1}{r^2}$$

At t=to we enter the gravitational field and assuming the velocity and acceleration was 0 then:

$$x = x_{0}-\frac{1}{6}j(t-t_{0})^3$$

where j is the jerk or

$$\dot{a}\left(t\right)$$

How can we find the jerk?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

3 comment threads

Can't "enter" infinite gravitational field. (4 comments)
I guess I'm a little confused about one of your criteria ("without . . . acceleration"): in this exam... (5 comments)
Post Feedback (1 comment)
Post
+3
−0

I'm assuming that what's happening is that, for $t<t_0$, there's no gravitational field, then it's mysteriously instantaneously turned on at $t=t_0$.

We can perform a Taylor expansion of $x$ around $t=t_0$ to give \begin{equation}x = x_0 + \dot{x}\left(t-t_0\right) + \frac{1}{2}\ddot{x}\left(t-t_0\right)^2 + \frac{1}{6}\dddot{x}\left(t-t_0\right)^3 + \cdots.\end{equation}

Now, we say that \begin{equation}\dddot{x} = j = \frac{da}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}.\end{equation} We know $a$ in Newtonian gravity is \begin{equation}a = -\frac{Gm}{x^2},\end{equation} giving \begin{equation}\frac{da}{dx} = \frac{2Gm}{x^3}.\end{equation}

By a similar argument, we also have that \begin{equation}a = \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt} = vv' = \frac{1}{2}\frac{d\left(v^2\right)}{dx}\end{equation} which gives that \begin{equation}v^2 = \frac{2Gm}{x} + C.\end{equation} Assuming that at $x=x_0$, $v=0$ gives that \begin{equation}v^2 = \frac{2Gm}{x} - \frac{2Gm}{x_0}.\end{equation}

This gives us our value of jerk as \begin{equation} j = \frac{2Gm}{x^3}\sqrt{\frac{2Gm}{x} - \frac{2Gm}{x_0}}.\end{equation}

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Why you wrote acceleration is negative? (3 comments)
Why you wrote acceleration is negative?
deleted user wrote over 2 years ago

Newton said, $g=\frac{Gm}{r^2}$. OK! I am taking $x=r$ and, $a=g$. $a=\frac{Gm}{x^2}$. Although, acceleration is positive. I also know that when we push objects upward then, acceleration becomes negative. But, OP doesn't say we are pushing up or down.

Mithrandir24601‭ wrote over 2 years ago

In general, you need some kind of reference to distinguish up from down, but lacking that, we normally say 'down' is the direction gravity pulls us. It's an arbitrary choice though, sure. If you swap up and down here, you'll just find a couple of minus sign differences, but as the direction has changed the actual result will be the same

deleted user wrote over 2 years ago

Gotcha! Thanks.