Is this a physics discussion or new energy? [closed]

Part 1

Say we have a round water pool, the radius is 10m, and the water depth is 2m.

C is a fixed point:

• Fixed on the surface of water.
• Fixed at the center of the pool.

F1 is stable force.

• Always 1 kg.
• The direction is always as same as gravity.
• The target always is C.

W1 is a fixed wave.

• Is generated by F1.
• Is the trace of the motion of C.
• Fixed at the center of the pool.

D1 is the amplitude of W1.

S is the height of the position of C when the water is calm and steady. Currently the S is 2m.

L1 is the smallest height of C in every single cycle. Which is also the lowest point of W1 (each cycle).

H1 is the largest height of C in every single cycle. Which is also the highest point of W1 (each cycle).

D1 + D1 = (H1 - S) + (S - L1)

D1 x 2 = H1 - L1

Stage 1:

After we apply F1 to the still water. We generated the W1. Under certain condition CDN1, we keep applying F1 at the exact same status of every W1. We call this specific status ST1.

Eventually,

Q1. Can we amplify D1 to 1 meter? Please proof it with physics.

Q2. How large the D1 can be finally? Please find the physical formulas.

Stage 2:

Now with add some payload into the system, PL, weight 1000 kgw. The PL would always be floating on the water like a ship, and it is fixed against the edge of the pool.

When the energy of W1 and F1 was transmitted to the edge of the pool, will create another wave, W2. W2 is also the motion track of PL.

D2 is the amplitude of W2.

L2 is the smallest height of PL in every single cycle. Which is also the lowest point of W2 (each cycle).

H2 is the largest height of PL in every single cycle. Which is also the highest point of W2 (each cycle).

D2 + D2 = (H2 - S) + (S - L2)

D2 x 2 = H2 - L2

F2 is a stable force:

• the direction is always as same as gravity.
• the target to apply always will be C.

After we apply F2 to the still water. We generated the W1 and W2. Under certain condition CDN2, we keep applying F2 at the exact same status of every W1. We call this specific status ST2.

And eventually,

Q3. In order to make D2 greater th 0, what is the minimum require to F2? Please proof it with physics.

Q4. Is it possible to make D2 1 meter? Please proof it with physics.

Q5. In theory, how large D2 can be? Please find the physical formulas.

Stage 3:

Q6. Eventually, would there be satisfying economical benefit for each cycle of W2?

Please consider the energy requirement of all components of the whole system for each cycle.

And again, please find the physical formula.

If we could reject hypothesis from Q1 to Q6 by physics, then these articles was nothing but some physics discussions. Please quit reading this post.

On the other hand, if we could proof that from Q1 to Q6 were all true. This might be our new energy.

Stage 4:

Q7. Are ST1 and ST2 the same status?

Q8. What are the most efficient CDN1 and CDN2?

Q9. Every single piece of this system can be improved for several times at least. How do we improve these components?

Notes:

This method is a lego block which generate kinetic energy. To transform energy into electricity is another lego block. The form of transform blocks or how to connect generate blocks with transform blocks is the matter of imagination and creativity.

Instead of be leverage of all forms of wars and invasions, the energy of the people's livelihood should be common property for all mankind.

Anyone who use this method has only obligation to obey: Please distribute this method proactively and freely.

In the name of the people's livelihood, there are three information shall be distributed when able.

1. This method.
2. Physical formulas.
3. Improvements.

Part 2

Part 1 is a method to stack small energy to a huge one. With this method, there might be something more could be discussed.

In a low friction environment, round track. A bot B would always move along this track.

When we give F3 to B, and B could move for 2 and half laps. Q10. If we keep applying exact the same F3 to B at same postion in each and every lap. Eventually, could B and F3 provide satisfying economical kinetic energy from the later every lap?

If we trap a light into a designed round plane and keep amplify the energy of that light with same concept as part 1.

Q11. Will there be anything to happen if the energy of that light is really huge?

Q12. Will there be anything to happen if two or more these amplified light collide with or twine around each other?

Q13. Will there be anything to happen if two or more these amplified light with different wavelegth collide with or twine around each other?

Under the same concept,

Q14. What if we replace the light with other wave like materials or energy, such as sound, electricity, particles, or other form of force?

Q15. What if we create the collision or twine with different properties or types of these materials or energy?