Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

What is $\mathcal{O}$ in integration of potential?

+0
−0

I saw following equation in Griffiths EM $$V(r)=-\int_\mathcal{O}^r \vec E \cdot d\vec l$$

While the surface was closed but not symmetrical circular. At first I was thinking $\mathcal O$ was representing closed surface and $r$ was representing radius of that circle. But when I noticed the circle isn't symmetrical I claimed that my thought was wrong. The circle was started at point A and end at point B, After looking at that non-symmetrical circle I thought Griffiths will write an integrand like this : $$V(r)=-\int_A^B \vec E \cdot d\vec l$$ but his method confused me.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+1
−0

Actually $\mathcal O$ is some standard point and $r$ is where potential depends on.

$$V(b)-V(a)=-\int_{\mathcal{O}}^B \vec E \cdot d\vec l +\int_{\mathcal{O}}^A \vec E \cdot d\vec l $$ $$ =-\int_{\mathcal{O}}^B \vec E \cdot d\vec l-\int^{\mathcal{O}}_B \vec E \cdot d\vec l$$ $$=-\int_A^B \vec E \cdot d \vec l$$

which was completely related to OP's equation. But the problem was the OP was talking about a potential point while it's valid for potential differences.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »