Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

Post History

33%
+0 −2
Q&A What does Lagrangian actually represent?

posted 1y ago by deleted user  ·  edited 1y ago by deleted user

Answer
#3: Post edited by user avatar deleted user · 2021-09-04T07:29:15Z (about 1 year ago)
  • Lagrangian is no energy. It’s just the Lagrangian. It's perhaps more fundamental than energy in a certain sense.
  • In general, you can think of it as a function that minimizes the action. That's the definition of Lagrangian. ~ said by [Golam Ishtiak](https://physics.stackexchange.com/users/240314/golam-ishtiak) (You can find him right [here](http://smartiansofscience.org/about/) also)
  • Lagrangian is no energy. It’s just the Lagrangian. It's perhaps more fundamental than energy in a certain sense.
  • In general, you can think of it as a function that minimizes the action. That's the definition of Lagrangian. ~ said by [Golam Ishtiak](https://physics.stackexchange.com/users/240314/golam-ishtiak) (You can find him right [here](http://smartiansofscience.org/about/) also)
  • ![For reference](https://physics.codidact.com/uploads/BvxASetjJjdj2dcDm2EAKCUz)
  • I don't have any opinion on it. Just posted what he told me.
#2: Post edited by user avatar deleted user · 2021-09-03T12:38:49Z (about 1 year ago)
  • Lagrangian is no energy. It’s just the Lagrangian. It's perhaps more fundamental than energy in a certain sense.
  • In general, you can think of it as a function that minimizes the action. That's the definition of Lagrangian. ~ said by [Golam Ishtiak](https://physics.stackexchange.com/users/240314/golam-ishtiak)
  • Lagrangian is no energy. It’s just the Lagrangian. It's perhaps more fundamental than energy in a certain sense.
  • In general, you can think of it as a function that minimizes the action. That's the definition of Lagrangian. ~ said by [Golam Ishtiak](https://physics.stackexchange.com/users/240314/golam-ishtiak) (You can find him right [here](http://smartiansofscience.org/about/) also)
#1: Initial revision by user avatar deleted user · 2021-09-03T12:38:01Z (about 1 year ago)
Lagrangian is no energy. It’s just the Lagrangian. It's perhaps more fundamental than energy in a certain sense.
In general, you can think of it as a function that minimizes the action. That's the definition of Lagrangian. ~ said by [Golam Ishtiak](https://physics.stackexchange.com/users/240314/golam-ishtiak)