Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs

Dashboard
Notifications
Mark all as read
Q&A

How dangerous is mounting and firing a gun on another human's body part? [closed]

+1
−3

Closed as off topic by Mithical‭ on Aug 2, 2021 at 18:58

This question is not within the scope of Physics.

This question was closed; new answers can no longer be added. Users with the reopen privilege may vote to reopen this question if it has been improved or closed incorrectly.

I stumbled these pictures on Quora, and I'm assuming they were real.

Wouldn't the supporter (person whom gun is mounted on) suffer hearing loss? Wouldn't the barrel burn his ear?

I'm assuming that no human can sit still enough and the supporter will flinch.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+3
−0

This looks like something the soldiers are being trained to do, or were trained to do. This means procedures were likely worked out that mitigate most bad effects most of the time. The top picture in particular looks like a training exercise, and both soldiers are wearing obvious hearing protection.

Wouldn't the supporter suffer hearing loss?

This is probably not as bad as it looks:

  1. It looks like the soldiers are wearing hearing protection.
  2. The loudest noise comes from the end of the barrel, not the side.
Wouldn't the barrel burn his ear?

I don't see any barrels touching ears. In no case is the actual barrel even touching the supporting soldier's garment, and certainly not his skin. In the top picture, it's not the barrel resting on the soldier's back. In the other picture, you can clearly see a perforated heat guard around the actual barrel. I expect those get hot eventually too, but not as hot as the actual barrel. There is also an insulating layer of uniform between that and the skin.

Again, it is doubtful the army wouldn't have established procedures for this to prevent injury if using a second soldier to steady a long barrel is standard practice.

I'm assuming that no human can sit still enough and the supporter will flinch.

Surely the second soldier will try to be as steady as possible. Of course there will be some inevitable movement, but that is still better than having one soldier trying to hold a long-barrel rifle while aiming by himself. If you're worried about flinching as a result of the shot, it doesn't work that way. The bullet will be well past the end of the barrel before human reaction time to the sound.

Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

This community is part of the Codidact network. We have other communities too — take a look!

You can also join us in chat!

Want to advertise this community? Use our templates!