Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

66%
+2 −0
Q&A Why would a 1.74 index lens be more prone to chip and be less resilient than 1.67?

To be optically equivalent, the lens made from lower index of refraction material needs to be thicker. My guess is that your optician thinks the metal grooved frames you want won't work well with ...

posted 3y ago by Olin Lathrop‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Olin Lathrop‭ · 2021-02-25T21:50:14Z (about 3 years ago)
To be optically equivalent, the lens made from lower index of refraction material needs to be thicker.

My guess is that your optician thinks the metal grooved frames you want won't work well with the outer thickness of the lenses.  Note that he's not saying 1.74 index is bad, but just that it's somewhat incompatible <i>with the particular frames you have chosen</i>.

-7 and even -6 is rather extreme.  This limits other tradeoffs.