Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Post History

80%
+6 −0
Q&A How does probability conservation work in Dirac's original formulation of relativistic QM?

I asked this question on Stack Exchange, and didn't get an answer, but maybe someone here will be able to help. In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, the normalization condition for position eige...

1 answer  ·  posted 3y ago by Technically Natural‭  ·  last activity 3y ago by Derek Elkins‭

#1: Initial revision by user avatar Technically Natural‭ · 2021-01-16T14:57:24Z (about 3 years ago)
How does probability conservation work in Dirac's original formulation of relativistic QM?
I asked this [question](https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/580945) on Stack Exchange, and didn't get an answer, but maybe someone here will be able to help.

In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, the normalization condition for position eigenstates is
$$\langle y|x\rangle = \delta(y−x).$$

However, this condition is not Lorentz-invariant. I have never seen a textbook on relativistic quantum mechanics address this normalization issue. It seems to me like this is a very important issue. If the normalization of the position eigenstates is not invariant, the inner product of any state vectors is also not necessarily invariant (and hence probability is not conserved under a Lorentz transformation).

How is this issue resolved? Is it necessary to resort to quantum field theory, or is there a way to rectify this issue within single-particle relativistic QM?