Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Why series springs behave like parallel? A comparison between parallel resistance and series spring.

Parent

Why series springs behave like parallel? A comparison between parallel resistance and series spring.

+3
−0

I know that equation for parallel resistance is $$\frac{1}{r_{tot}}=\sum_i \frac{1}{r_i}$$ But i wonder to see equation of series spring constant. If we add multiple spring in series. Then their total spring constant is $$\frac{1}{k_{tot}}=\sum_i \frac{1}{k_i}$$ Why series spring is behaving like parallel?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+3
−0

The spring constant specifies force per compression distance.

When you put multiple spring in series, the force on each spring is the same, which is also the overall force on the combined spring. The forces don't add.

However, the displacements do add. If you have three springs in series with each compressed 50 mm, then the overall spring is compressed 150 mm.

With multiple springs in parallel, the forces add but the displacements don't.

Whenever the arrangement adds the quantity in the numerator, the constants for each element are just added. Whenever the arrangement adds the quantity in the denominator, the individual constants are combined as in the parallel resistance formula, as you show.

Whether the constants of particular elements add or are combined as parallel resistances depend on which way we define the constants, and what we consider "parallel" and "series". Both these are somewhat arbitrary choices of convention on our part. We could just as well have decided to generally think in terms of conductance instead of resistance, and define a "resistor" as the current is passes per unit voltage.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Or we could have defined the spring constant the other way round, so that you'd get the displacement ... (1 comment)
Or we could have defined the spring constant the other way round, so that you'd get the displacement ...
celtschk‭ wrote almost 3 years ago

Or we could have defined the spring constant the other way round, so that you'd get the displacement as product of the constant and the applied force.