Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Comments on Is $E=mc^2$ true for all frame of references?

Post

Is $E=mc^2$ true for all frame of references?

+1
−1

Which one is correct? $$E=mc^2$$ or $$E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2$$

I mostly seen $$E=mc^2$$ from my childhood, and when I was learning problem solving in relativistic mechanics I had seen $$E^2=(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2$$ I know than if a frame at rest then momentum is $0$ hence $$E=mc^2$$ is true. But if a frame is not at rest then $E =mc^2$ true for that frame?

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

Define your terms. (2 comments)
Rest energy and momentum (1 comment)
Rest energy and momentum
gmcgath‭ wrote over 2 years ago

I'm very rusty on this topic, so I'm offering a comment rather than an answer. Feel free to correct anything that looks dumb here.

In special relativity, there is no such thing as a "rest" frame of reference. All non-accelerated frames of reference have equal standing. But the classic Einstein equation refers to rest energy, i.e., the potential energy that can be obtained by converting mass. The more general form of the equation includes the energy of momentum (in a given frame of reference) as well, so it includes kinetic as well as potential energy. Kinetic energy obviously does depend on the reference frame. Both equations are correct; it depends on what you're trying to do. This page may be helpful: http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~acosta/phy2061/lectures/Relativity4.pdf